A fisherman leaving the Irish coast could read the sky, inspect his nets, judge the tide, and still know that much remained beyond his control. Weather could change suddenly, a catch could disappear, gear could fail, and a routine trip could become dangerous within hours.

That uncertainty produced an occupational culture filled with rules about what should be said, who should be met, which animals should be left alone, and when a boat should remain tied up. Irish folklorist Bairbre Ní Fhloinn’s research shows that these customs varied greatly from harbour to harbour, yet together they formed a recognisable body of fishermen’s lore.

They were not decorative superstitions added after the working day. They shaped ordinary decisions before departure and at sea. A word, an encounter, or an animal could acquire weight because crews understood that once a warning had been ignored, whatever followed might be blamed on that choice.

Certain words were considered dangerous on boats or during preparations for fishing. Foxes, pigs, rabbits, and hares could be avoided in some communities, while particular people, including clergy, women, or red-haired individuals, were treated cautiously in others. The exact list depended on place and crew.

Fishermen developed substitute expressions instead. A fox might become “the bushy-tailed one,” while an animal whose proper name was avoided could simply become a “four-legger.” Ní Fhloinn titled her major study Cold Iron after one such replacement phrase, showing how deeply taboo language could enter daily speech.

Knowing these verbal rules marked someone as part of the occupation. A young fisherman had to learn currents, gear, weather, and boat handling, but also the language older men considered safe. Breaking a taboo could unsettle others even when the person who spoke the word privately doubted that anything supernatural would follow.

That is important because belief was rarely uniform. Some fishermen observed customs with conviction; others followed them cautiously or out of respect for the crew. Folklore survived because enough people considered the rule worth repeating, not because every person held exactly the same explanation for it.

Archival material preserves how quickly an ordinary meeting could become an omen. A belief recorded at Edenvella in County Leitrim stated that if the first woman a fisherman met in the morning had red hair, bad luck would follow him during the day.

Ní Fhloinn found wider traditions in which red-haired people and the colour category rua, meaning red or reddish-brown, occupied a strong place in fishermen’s taboo vocabulary. Yet such beliefs should not be treated as universal Irish rules. A sign familiar in one district might be unknown several harbours away.

The practical setting helps explain why a chance encounter could matter. A fisherman heading out in a small sailing or rowing boat could not know what the weather or catch would bring. Once something had been interpreted as unlucky, continuing meant accepting the possibility that every later mishap would be connected with it.

Animals could influence decisions just as strongly. Folklore collected at Desertegney near Buncrana records salmon fishermen working on Lough Swilly whose nets were repeatedly raided by a seal. The animal was costing them fish, yet the men would not shoot it because they believed killing the seal would bring bad luck.

That detail moves maritime superstition beyond curious sayings. The seal interfered directly with the fishermen’s income, but the feared consequences of killing it outweighed the immediate economic loss. Belief therefore entered the working economy, affecting what action a crew considered acceptable when livelihood was already uncertain.

Time could carry prohibitions too. Dúchas collections preserve traditions in which some coastal communities avoided fishing on Sundays or at particular religiously significant times, including customs associated with St Martin’s Eve. These practices were local rather than national, and neighbouring communities could follow different rules.

We’ll pause here for a moment to share a message from one of our partners that sponser this newsletter.

David Beckham, Giannis Antetokounmpo, Aryna Sabalenka and Inter Miami CF choose IM8. In a 12-week trial, 95% felt more energy, 85% better digestion, 80% better sleep and 75% sharper focus. NSF Certified for Sport and recommended by 300+ clinicians, discover the IM8 routine and see the clinical results for yourself.

Discover Your IM8 Routine

Back to the newsletter…

That variation is essential. There was no single Irish fisherman’s handbook of forbidden behaviour. Ní Fhloinn’s research compares full-time and part-time fishermen, inland and open-water communities, different regions, and different levels of belief, revealing a culture that was shared in broad shape but intensely local in detail.

Irish fishermen also belonged to a wider North Atlantic maritime world. Related taboos appeared in Britain, Scandinavia, and other fishing regions where people faced similar risks. Comparable traditions do not make the Irish material generic; they show how communities adapted recurring maritime anxieties to local language, religion, and memory.

The appeal of these rules becomes clearer when viewed from the boat rather than the shore. Superstition could not stop a storm or guarantee salmon in a net, but it could turn uncertainty into a set of actions. Something could be avoided, something done correctly, and behaviour shared across the crew.

There may also have been practical value inside apparently irrational customs. Scholarly discussion of Cold Iron notes Ní Fhloinn’s argument that remembering prohibitions demanded alertness, reinforced attention, and strengthened occupational identity. A rule could matter socially even when its supernatural explanation was doubted.

On a small boat, cohesion mattered. Fishing required trust, coordination, and accumulated experience, often in dangerous conditions. Deliberately mocking a respected prohibition could create anxiety or conflict among men who depended on one another, so following the custom could itself become an act of cooperation.

The tradition could outlast technology. Modern engines, forecasts, radios, and navigation equipment reduced some uncertainties, but they did not erase the old knowledge immediately. Ní Fhloinn’s interviews show that fishermen still remembered prohibitions into the late twentieth century, even when observance and literal belief had weakened.

Calling these practices superstition can make them sound foolish when removed from their setting. In context, they belonged to a working culture shaped by risk, debt, hunger, injury, weather, and the possibility of death. The sea offered a livelihood while refusing to offer certainty.

That is why something as small as a word could matter. These customs did not command the Atlantic. They gave generations of fishermen a shared way to approach it, carrying inherited caution from shore to boat whenever the horizon offered no guarantee of what the day would bring.

Thanks for spending a little time with Irish Roots today. These old rules belonged to working communities that knew the sea could provide a livelihood and take one away. We’re glad to have you here with us, keeping the stories, beliefs, and everyday lives behind Ireland’s heritage from slipping out of memory.